Fact Based List:
Value-based MA Models versus FFS Medicare Models: Comparison of 8 Patient Outcomes
Submitted by Charlene Ice on Fri, 03/17/2023 - 15:52
- Patients in value-based Medicare Advantage (MA) models had 6% lower odds of acute inpatient admission through the emergency department (ED) than those in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) models.
- Patients in value-based MA models had 6% lower rates of return to the ED within 30 days.
- Patients in value-based MA models had 14% lower odds of avoidable ED visits.
- Patients in value-based MA models were 18% less likely to be admitted to the hospital.
- Patients in value-based MA models had a 9% lower 30-day hospital readmission rate.
- Patients in value-based MA models were 11% less likely to visit the ED.
- Patients in value-based MA models were 44% less likely to be readmitted for complications linked to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma exacerbation.
- Patients in value-based MA models had 10% lower odds of admission for stroke or myocardial infarction.
Notes: From an article entitled, 'Comparison of Care Quality Metrics in 2-Sided Risk Medicare Advantage vs Fee-for-Service Medicare Programs," by Kenneth Cohen, MD1; Omid Ameli, MD, DrPH1; Christine E. Chaisson, MPH et. al.
Source: JAMA Network Open, December 12, 2022
Source URL: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle...
List Ratings: |
Lists You Might Also Be Interested In
- 5 Key Trends for 2011 According to Cyndy Nayer, Center for Health Value Innovation
- Jeanna Palmer Gunville: 3 Strategies to manage risk in the value-based payment environment
- Vera Gruessner: 5 Best Practices to Advance Value-Based Care Reimbursement
- Valerie Phillips: Five steps to help medtech succeed in a value-based care context
- Journal of General Internal Medicine: Percent of total cost for 7 low-value preventive services in Medicare, 2007-2016
Login or register to post comments