Fact Based List:
UnitedHealth Group: Comparison of 6 Quality Metrics for Global Capitation vs. Fee-for-Service
Submitted by Charlene Ice on Thu, 08/13/2020 - 11:39
- Breast cancer screening rate: global capitation 80% vs. FFS 74%
- Colorectal cancer screening rate: global capitation 82% vs. FFS 74%
- Controlled blood sugar levels: global capitation 89% vs. FFS 80%
- Eye exams: global capitation 84% vs. FFS 74%
- Functional status assessment rate: global capitation 96% vs. FFS 86%
- Medication review: global capitation 97% vs. FFS 92%
Notes: Global capitation pays a set amount per month per patient. The study used metrics from the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) related to preventive care and chronic conditions.
Source: UnitedHealth Group Press Release, August 11, 2020
Source URL: https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/2020/uhg-study-sh...
List Ratings: |
Lists You Might Also Be Interested In
- 6 Proposed Quality Measures in CMS' New APM Performance Pathways (APP) Model for ACOs or other APMs
- Jennifer Goforth Gregory: 3 health organizations that use predictive analytics to improve patient care quality
- Wolters Kluwer Health's Findings From Physician Survey and Efficiency and Quality
- Tamara Rosin: 11 Healthcare Organizations Designated 'Best Places To Work For LGBT Equality'
- Highest Ranked Communities in Medicare's Hospital Quality of Care Rankings
Login or register to post comments