|
This list is published on healthsprocket.com at Source URL: https://healthsprocket.com/hs/content/unitedhealth-group-comparison-6-quality-metrics-global-capitation-vs-fee-service Visit now to read comments, add your own comments and rate this list. |
Fact Based List:
UnitedHealth Group: Comparison of 6 Quality Metrics for Global Capitation vs. Fee-for-Service
Submitted By Charlene Ice, Created 08/13/2020 - 11:39
- Breast cancer screening rate: global capitation 80% vs. FFS 74%
- Colorectal cancer screening rate: global capitation 82% vs. FFS 74%
- Controlled blood sugar levels: global capitation 89% vs. FFS 80%
- Eye exams: global capitation 84% vs. FFS 74%
- Functional status assessment rate: global capitation 96% vs. FFS 86%
- Medication review: global capitation 97% vs. FFS 92%
Source: UnitedHealth Group Press Release, August 11, 2020
Source URL: https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/2020/uhg-study-sh...
Notes: Global capitation pays a set amount per month per patient. The study used metrics from the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) related to preventive care and chronic conditions.