Fact Based List:
UnitedHealth Group: Comparison of 6 Quality Metrics for Global Capitation vs. Fee-for-Service
Submitted by Charlene Ice on Thu, 08/13/2020 - 11:39
- Breast cancer screening rate: global capitation 80% vs. FFS 74%
- Colorectal cancer screening rate: global capitation 82% vs. FFS 74%
- Controlled blood sugar levels: global capitation 89% vs. FFS 80%
- Eye exams: global capitation 84% vs. FFS 74%
- Functional status assessment rate: global capitation 96% vs. FFS 86%
- Medication review: global capitation 97% vs. FFS 92%
Notes: Global capitation pays a set amount per month per patient. The study used metrics from the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) related to preventive care and chronic conditions.
Source: UnitedHealth Group Press Release, August 11, 2020
Source URL: https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/2020/uhg-study-sh...
List Ratings: |
Lists You Might Also Be Interested In
- Andis Robeznieks: CMS 2018 Quality Payment Program - 3 areas of concern
- Wolters Kluwer Health's Findings From Physician Survey and Efficiency and Quality
- 5 Initiatives to Improve Health Equality in the U.S.: percentage with initiative in place
- National Quality Forum: 10 Key Elements For Improving Population Health
- 3 quality indicators experienced by CareFirst's overall PCMH membership since its inception in 2011:
Login or register to post comments